The Little Mermaid Review: A Charming Tale, Marred by Many Niggles

Published on October 2, 2026
Review of The Little Mermaid

Introduction

Disney’s live-action adaptations often arrive with a tidal wave of anticipation, and the latest reimagining of The Little Mermaid was no exception. Audiences braced for a fresh take on the beloved animated classic, hoping for a magical journey under the sea. Initially, the experience felt surprisingly enjoyable, even "cute." Yet, as the credits rolled and the initial glow faded, a cascade of "nitpicks" began to surface, accumulating into what felt like a "death by a thousand cuts." This underwater adventure, while sweet at its core, is undeniably covered by a sea of minor annoyances.

The Lead Dynamic & The Action

The true heart and soul of this film, its very nucleus, lies in the captivating chemistry between Ariel and Prince Eric. Halle Bailey delivers a sweet, endearing Ariel, brimming with curious naiveté and an undeniably amazing voice. Prince Eric, portrayed by Jonah Hauer-King, is given welcome depth, moving beyond the animated version's "pretty guy you got a kiss in three days" archetype. This fleshing out of Eric's character allows for a genuine connection to blossom, making their romance feel earned despite the compressed timeline.

However, not all elements translate as smoothly. The iconic "Under the Sea" sequence, a vibrant, energetic showstopper in the original, here feels like a "pretty good karaoke example." Where the animated version was a "cup of coffee in the morning that got you going," this rendition is more akin to "taking a piss in the morning"—routine, uninspired, and merely a means to an end. The stylistic punch of animation is sorely missed, particularly when marine life is listed off without actually being shown playing instruments, leaving a visual void.

Inline Image 1

Cameos, Nostalgia & Narrative Stakes

Melissa McCarthy steps into the formidable tentacles of Ursula, and for 99% of her performance, she genuinely embodies the sea witch's sinister charm. There's a singular "Melissa McCarthy moment" that feels jarringly out of place, a comedic beat that reminds you this is a family film, but it’s a minor stumble in an otherwise strong portrayal. Curiously, the film opts for a darker fate for those who cross Ursula, with mer-people simply dying rather than becoming seaweed slaves—a choice that, ironically, feels more grim than the original's "less dark" alternative.

New musical segments, not present in the original, feel conspicuously "shoehorned" into the narrative. They lack the synergistic consistency of the established score, feeling like compositions made decades later that don't quite belong in the same world. These additions contribute to a runtime that stretches 50 minutes longer than the original, a length that feels largely unnecessary despite some of it being dedicated to developing Eric and Ariel's relationship. Furthermore, the climactic "wedding" from the original is downgraded to an "engagement party," a subtle but significant shift that diminishes the narrative stakes and urgency of the race against time.

Tone, Direction & Creative Freedom

The film often feels "at war with itself" regarding its timing and pacing. Dialogue from the animated original is sometimes forced into scenes where it doesn't flow naturally, creating an awkward rhythm. Creative liberties are taken, but not always for the better. The absence of the beloved "Les Poissons" (the cook segment) is a "huge bummer," a missed opportunity for a fun, perspective-driven moment. There's also a peculiar inconsistency where Scuttle is shown eating fish, despite the film's efforts to make marine life appear more "real," raising questions about the internal logic.

Inline Image 2

The Final Verdict

Despite its many nitpicks and moments of creative misstep, the core charm of The Little Mermaid endures. The undeniable chemistry between Ariel and Eric anchors the film, making it a sweet and enjoyable experience for families. It’s a good time, no alcohol required, especially at matinee prices. While it may suffer from a "thousand cuts" of minor annoyances, the heart of the story still shines through.

What Worked

  • Strong, palpable chemistry between Ariel and Eric.
  • Halle Bailey delivers a sweet, endearing Ariel with an amazing voice.
  • Prince Eric's character is fleshed out, adding depth to the romance.
  • Melissa McCarthy's portrayal of Ursula is largely effective and sinister.
  • Overall, a sweet and enjoyable film for families despite its flaws.

What Didn't Work

  • The "Under the Sea" sequence lacks the original's energy and visual flair.
  • New musical numbers feel shoehorned and inconsistent with the original score.
  • An unnecessarily bloated runtime, 50 minutes longer than the original.
  • Reduced narrative stakes due to the change from a wedding to an engagement party.
  • Pacing issues and awkward dialogue flow in certain scenes.
  • The removal of the "Les Poissons" segment is a missed opportunity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is The Little Mermaid worth watching?

What is The Little Mermaid rated and why?

Who directed and stars in The Little Mermaid?

Does The Little Mermaid have a post-credits scene?

Final Rating
3.5 / 5

Screenverse editorial scores are graded on a 5-star standard based on narrative coherence, pacing, cinematography, and artistic execution.

Leo Sterling
Editorial Reviewer

Leo Sterling

Senior Film Critic & Entertainment Journalist

Leo Sterling has over a decade of experience in cinema critique, screenwriting analysis, and festival coverage. He leads the editorial voice at Screenverse, ensuring all reviews provide impartial, spoiler-conscious insights for film enthusiasts.