Twisters Review: Pure Adrenaline, Unbridled Fun

Published on October 2, 2026
Review of Twisters

Introduction

After decades, the cinematic landscape once again braces for the raw power of nature with Twisters, a spiritual successor to the beloved 1996 classic. Audiences have been eagerly anticipating a return to the heartland, hoping for a disaster movie that delivers on its promise of pure, unadulterated fun. The bar was set high: could this new generation of storm chasers capture the same unbridled energy and spectacle, perhaps even delivering a flying cow or two? While the bovine aerial acrobatics remain elusive, this film largely succeeds in its mission to be a good time, no brain power required.

The Lead Dynamic & The Action

At the heart of Twisters is Daisy Edgar-Jones, who anchors the film with her character's uncanny ability to predict the unpredictable path of these monstrous storms. Her journey is complemented by Anthony Ramos, whose character initially seems poised for a significant connection. However, the dynamic truly ignites with the arrival of Glen Powell. Powell's character embodies the modern, brash, and often obnoxious face of storm chasing—think private companies and "ye"-slinging YouTubers. He's initially presented as the quintessential douche, all attitude and swagger, yet the film wisely peels back layers to reveal a surprising depth that elevates his performance beyond mere caricature. The action itself is a relentless, thrilling spectacle. The tornadoes aren't just weather phenomena; they are presented as terrifying, devouring monsters, reminiscent of a classic creature feature. The tension comes from the constant dance of getting close enough to scan these beasts without getting "gobbled up," a high-stakes game that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.

Inline Image 1

Cameos, Nostalgia & Narrative Stakes

Twisters positions itself as a standalone sequel, meaning newcomers can jump right in without needing to revisit the original. While there are subtle nods and references for long-time fans, the film doesn't rely on heavy lore. In fact, some moments feel strikingly familiar, almost as if the first movie is being replayed with a fresh coat of paint—a particular drive-in scene, for instance, echoes an iconic moment from its predecessor. Yet, this isn't a flaw; for a film that isn't "lore heavy IP," this approach works. It's a throwback that embraces its roots without being bogged down by them, delivering a familiar yet fresh experience that prioritizes fun over intricate narrative continuity.

Tone, Direction & Creative Freedom

Director Lee Isaac Chung masterfully crafts a tone that is unabashedly fun and doesn't take itself too seriously. The film feels like an organic '90s throwback, not in a forced, nostalgic way, but through its very essence. A significant contributor to this authentic feel is the decision to shoot on 35mm film. This technical choice not only lends a classic aesthetic but also, as some directors attest, allows CGI to blend more seamlessly, enhancing the visual realism of the devastating storms. The result is an atmosphere and tone that genuinely evokes the spirit of the original, proving that sometimes, going back to basics can yield the most impactful results. It's a film that clearly had the freedom to go wild, and it does so with infectious enthusiasm.

Inline Image 2

The Final Verdict

Ultimately, Twisters is a good time, plain and simple. It's a film that doesn't give a damn, delivering unbridled, unpretentious fun that requires no alcohol to enjoy. While it might rehash some familiar beats and initially present characters that feel a touch one-dimensional, its relentless action, surprising character depth from Glen Powell, and genuine throwback aesthetic make it a thrilling ride. If you're looking for a loud, exciting, and thoroughly entertaining disaster movie that feels like a spiritual successor to a beloved classic, then buckle up. This storm chase is well worth joining.

What Worked

  • Unabashed, unbridled disaster action.
  • [[person:83271|Glen Powell]]'s surprisingly deep performance.
  • Authentic throwback feel thanks to 35mm filming.
  • Accessible as a standalone sequel.
  • Tornadoes treated like terrifying monsters.

What Didn't Work

  • Rehashes some iconic moments from the original.
  • Initially one-dimensional character portrayals.
  • Lacks the iconic flying cow moment.
  • Follows predictable disaster movie beats.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Twisters worth watching?

What is Twisters rated and why?

Who directed and stars in Twisters?

Does Twisters have a post-credits scene?

Final Rating
3.5 / 5

Screenverse editorial scores are graded on a 5-star standard based on narrative coherence, pacing, cinematography, and artistic execution.

Leo Sterling
Editorial Reviewer

Leo Sterling

Senior Film Critic & Entertainment Journalist

Leo Sterling has over a decade of experience in cinema critique, screenwriting analysis, and festival coverage. He leads the editorial voice at Screenverse, ensuring all reviews provide impartial, spoiler-conscious insights for film enthusiasts.