What Men Want Review: A Promising Premise, A Flat Delivery

Published on October 2, 2026
Review of What Men Want

Introduction

Remember the early 2000s, when the idea of a gender-swapped "What Women Want" felt like an overdue comedic goldmine? Well, What Men Want finally arrived, bringing Taraji P. Henson into the mind-reading hot seat, tasked with navigating the unfiltered thoughts of men. The concept itself is ripe for laughs and insightful commentary, promising a fresh take on an old favorite. The anticipation was certainly there for a film that could truly explore the comedic potential of such a premise.

The Lead Dynamic & The Action

While Taraji P. Henson brings her undeniable charisma, the film's humor often struggles to land. Many jokes simply fall flat, feeling less like sharp wit and more like awkward ad-libs that somehow made it past the editing room. The portrayal of men, particularly in the film's opening act, leans heavily into exaggerated "meathead jock" stereotypes. While hyperbole can serve comedy, here it often feels cartoony, undermining any genuine connection or comedic payoff. The one shining beacon of humor, by a clear mile, is Erykah Badu as the weed-selling voodoo lady, whose scenes provide the film's most genuinely funny moments.

Inline Image 1

Cameos, Nostalgia & Narrative Stakes

What Men Want attempts to juggle multiple narrative threads, from career ambition to romance and self-discovery. However, this ambition often leads to a messy plot where no single lesson truly resonates. A prime example is a poker scene, which feels less like a pivotal moment and more like a montage designed to showcase cameos rather than advance the story or build character. The film struggles to balance its desire for broad comedy with its underlying message about connection and respect, resulting in a diluted impact. It wants to tell a story about her career, a romance, and a journey of self-improvement, but in trying to do too much, it achieves too little.

Tone, Direction & Creative Freedom

Directed by Adam Shankman, the film's comedic tone often misses the mark. The reliance on exaggerated characters and flat jokes makes the runtime feel significantly longer than it is. A good concept can only carry a film so far; the execution needs to deliver on the promise. Here, the comedy often feels forced, and the narrative meanders, leaving the audience feeling that the potential for a truly wild and insightful ride was squandered. The film feels like it's trying too hard to be funny without actually being funny.

Inline Image 2

The Final Verdict

Ultimately, What Men Want is a film that, despite a promising premise and a talented lead, fails to leave a lasting impression. The jokes are largely forgettable, the plot is muddled, and the overall experience is a missed opportunity. While it aims for a fun, gender-flipped comedy, it lands closer to a forgettable, overlong endeavor. It's a bummer, because the core idea had so much potential for genuine laughs and meaningful insights.

What Worked

  • Intriguing gender-swap premise from "What Women Want".
  • [[person:4237|Erykah Badu]] delivers genuinely funny moments as the voodoo lady.
  • Attempts to explore themes of connection and respect.
  • [[person:40036|Taraji P. Henson]] brings her usual charismatic performance.

What Didn't Work

  • Many jokes fall flat and feel awkward.
  • Exaggerated, one-dimensional male characters.
  • Messy plot with too many unresolved narrative threads.
  • Overly long runtime for its content.
  • Forgettable overall experience despite a good concept.
  • Underutilized cameos and poorly executed poker scene.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is What Men Want worth watching?

What is What Men Want rated and why?

Who directed and stars in What Men Want?

Does What Men Want have a post-credits scene?

Final Rating
2 / 5

Screenverse editorial scores are graded on a 5-star standard based on narrative coherence, pacing, cinematography, and artistic execution.

Leo Sterling
Editorial Reviewer

Leo Sterling

Senior Film Critic & Entertainment Journalist

Leo Sterling has over a decade of experience in cinema critique, screenwriting analysis, and festival coverage. He leads the editorial voice at Screenverse, ensuring all reviews provide impartial, spoiler-conscious insights for film enthusiasts.