Jupiter Ascending Review: Visually Stunning, Narratively Chaotic

Published on October 2, 2026
Review of Jupiter Ascending

Introduction

When the Wachowskis, the visionary minds behind "The Matrix," announce a new space opera, expectations soar. Jupiter Ascending promised a return to grand, original sci-fi, a sprawling universe filled with unique creatures and high-stakes drama. From the outset, the film delivers on the visual spectacle, offering a feast for the eyes that few can match, yet it struggles to coalesce into a truly memorable cinematic experience.

The Lead Dynamic & The Action

The film introduces us to Mila Kunis as Jupiter Jones, a seemingly ordinary woman scrubbing toilets, who discovers she's the reincarnated queen of a vast cosmic empire. Her journey into this new reality is spearheaded by Channing Tatum's Caine Wise, a genetically engineered ex-military hunter with "galactic roller skates" and a penchant for "space gymnastics." While both actors deliver functional performances, it's Channing Tatum's dynamic, ass-kicking action sequences that truly impress, showcasing the Wachowskis' flair for kinetic, visually inventive combat. The film consistently provides a "visually good time," with moments that genuinely "blew my hair back," proving that even when the narrative falters, the spectacle remains exciting enough to watch.

Inline Image 1

Cameos, Nostalgia & Narrative Stakes

Jupiter Ascending attempts to build a rich mythology, drawing inspiration from Greek tales of warring siblings vying for cosmic inheritance. This concept, with its echoes of ancient gods, is intriguing. However, the execution quickly devolves into a "complete mess." The plot feels like a "damn video game," with Jupiter being shuffled from one character to another, each encounter feeling like a new "level" rather than an organic progression. Eddie Redmayne's performance as the villain, Balem Abrasax, is certainly distinctive, channeling a bizarre blend of "Richard Harris meets Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs" with a notably "weird ass voice" that becomes a memorable, if perplexing, character choice.

A significant misstep is the extensive focus on Jupiter's Earth family. What was intended to ground her character ultimately becomes a "colossal waste of time," a subplot that feels forced and irrelevant, detracting from the cosmic stakes. The film's attempt to make these characters "relevant" falls flat, highlighting a common narrative challenge: when a "nobody becomes a big thing," sometimes it's simpler, and more effective, to make them an orphan.

Tone, Direction & Creative Freedom

The Wachowskis are renowned for their grand vision and expansive scope, and Jupiter Ascending is no exception. The film is undeniably ambitious, with a universe that feels vast and imaginative. However, this ambition isn't always matched by narrative coherence. It feels as though the film began as an "impressive series of storyboards," brimming with fantastic concepts, but the script itself needed a different hand. The Wachowskis' strength lies in visual storytelling and world-building, but the narrative often feels "not cohesive at all," suggesting that perhaps the writing duties should have been entrusted to others. The result is a film that, despite its visual splendor, is "never refined to be a great movie."

Inline Image 2

The Final Verdict

Jupiter Ascending is a "watchable enough disaster" that, while visually stunning and occasionally thrilling, ultimately fails to leave a lasting impression. It's the kind of movie you might have on in the background, a visually engaging distraction rather than a compelling narrative. Despite its grand scope and impressive visuals, the film's convoluted plot, wasted subplots, and uneven pacing make it largely forgettable. While the actors do their parts well enough, and the underlying mythology has potential, the overall experience is a chaotic journey through a beautiful but ultimately messy universe. You're unlikely to remember it "in T minus one day."

What Worked

  • Breathtaking visual effects and world-building
  • Exciting and kinetic action sequences
  • Grand scope and ambitious concepts
  • Functional performances from the lead actors
  • Intriguing underlying mythology

What Didn't Work

  • Convoluted and messy plot structure
  • Wasted and irrelevant Earth family subplot
  • Uneven pacing and narrative coherence
  • Eddie Redmayne's distracting vocal performance
  • Ultimately forgettable despite its spectacle

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jupiter Ascending worth watching?

What is Jupiter Ascending rated and why?

Who directed and stars in Jupiter Ascending?

Does Jupiter Ascending have a post-credits scene?

Final Rating
2 / 5

Screenverse editorial scores are graded on a 5-star standard based on narrative coherence, pacing, cinematography, and artistic execution.

Leo Sterling
Editorial Reviewer

Leo Sterling

Senior Film Critic & Entertainment Journalist

Leo Sterling has over a decade of experience in cinema critique, screenwriting analysis, and festival coverage. He leads the editorial voice at Screenverse, ensuring all reviews provide impartial, spoiler-conscious insights for film enthusiasts.